Thursday, September 4, 2014

The Texas Offense In Pictures..., And Swoopes

Well, I presume Texas Football fans are aware that the team will be moving forward without their starting quarterback David Ash. Sophomore backup Tyrone Swoopes will be taking over the starting quarterback role vs BYU in Texas' week two match-up. So, this pictorial will serve to illustrate some ideas and concepts and how they may relate to Swoopes' ability. So, what type of things did we see on Saturday?

Shift And Motion Game

As you may or may not remember from my first post, 'Shawn Watson's Offense', there will be a frequent use of shifts and motion. A defense's front and coverage responsibilities can be drastically changed as the offense's players threaten different gaps and areas of coverage via pre-snap shifts. It also helps to get your players into better front and coverage match-ups. The following images serve as examples of this.


The above example is very simple, the H-back coming across formation from a wing alignment field side to a spot behind the offensive tackle to the boundary. Notice the leverage gained by the H-back on his block of the defensive end. Now to something with more pre-snap movement.


Here is another example, the tight end and wing shift into the "I" formation. The FB then shifts to the weakside in the formation. By the time the ball is snapped, the offense has changed the gaps, potential routes, and possible protection scheme multiple times.The clear intent from the offense screams run, but with off-man coverage on the receiver to the top paired with run-action, it's an easy read and throw for the quarterback. Whether this type of concept will be available to Texas' vs their next opponent remains to be seen, but it is a concept I feel Swoopes will be able to execute.

Up next is a similar example with a screen play attached instead of quick game. I didn't capture the shift here, but the tight end shifts to "I" then leads right. This cues the alley defender to fit the run due to the extra gap created by the tight end, thus winning numbers and space for the bubble screen.

It's hard to be certain how many of these plays are the result of pre-snap checks made by the quarterback. It's yet to be known if Swoopes can make proper checks on a consistent basis. Nevertheless, if they need to be discarded, there are other ways the offense can utilize similar concepts within the current offensive framework.


Read-option game

The next set of images highlight some of the read-option concepts observed. In the first image we see what looks to be a packaged play concept. Ash appears to be reading the slot defender while meshing with the RB on the inside zone run play. I expect to see this concept fleshed out more going forward. There are different route concepts that may be run here, but I suspect the slot receiver is running a stick route in this pic. This type of concept is what I'd focus on with Swoopes in at quarterback. Whether from 1 or 2 tight end sets or spread sets it allows the quarterback to focus on 1 defender and also allows him the option to give on the mesh if he's unclear about what he's seeing. With Swoopes in the game, much of the game plan will focus on mitigating large downside risk regarding tackles for loss (TFL) and sacks.


The next example is the zone-bubble packaged play. Ash did a poor job with this play in my opinion as the screen receiver has already won leverage on the alley defender. He holds the ball too long and doesn't get the ball out on time. The throw is not shown here, but the ball sails high and results in an incompletion. This is a play that simply requires more repetitions and is something I'd expect to see a lot considering the team's strength is the run game and there are very capable receiver to both block and catch these screens.


The following play really stood out to me, the tunnel screen and running back screen packaged play. I wasn't sure what the read was pre-snap, but I liked the idea very much. I suspect we'll see this again and it will have to be cleaned up with respect to the blocking and running back path. Nevertheless, I lumped this into the option plays, as it is a packaged double screen.



Quarterback Movement Game

The next images are a glimpse of what some refer to as the bootleg or as I call it, the waggle. It involves run-action and quarterback misdirection. In the play below, it's a called run, you'll notice the linebacker flow toward the playside. The lack of backside contain is what is punished when the quarterback keeps the ball and looks to pass or run on the backside. Look for this to be featured prominently going forward.


The next two examples build on this concept. It pairs very well with zone and zone slice runs and as you can see below the receiver to the boundary arcs across the offensive line and attacks the short zone to the field side, for an easy pitch and catch.


The next example includes many shifts, the first leading to a bunch formation to the field side, then a double slot field side and wing to the boundary. Again we see zone action, this time with the wing player coming across and attacking the short zone to the field side. The combination of zone and waggle may become this team's best play and will probably be repetitioned to a great extent as the pass read is a simple high-low read, run, or throwaway. Swoopes should feel very comfortable running this scheme. It may be Texas' few potential big play concepts from here on.


The following is of some interest. It is what looks like a read play with a post-mesh quarterback release similar to naked. I suspect there is a lot more to this package as the top receiver can bypass his block for the zone run play, as well as the backside receiver crack blocking the field side contain player, thus yielding a quick pass to the outside receiver. OR, maybe I'm dreaming! 


Pistol Formation

Lastly, I wanted to feature the "Diamond" pistol formation. It would be my suggestion that Texas use this a lot more often. Here we see what I consider our goal line and short yardage diamond pistol formation. In this case, the tight end shifts to the boundary behind the tackle and Lead Iso is the run called, a great goal line play. The in-line tight end's block seals the deal here as it virtually divides the front and creates a pile-up preventing flow across the top of the line.

Now, my hope is that Texas uses different forms of the pistol (diamond and other variants) in different field postions. This formation is one of the best I've seen at isolating the outside receivers in man coverage and yielding easy single-high or two-high safety reads. Not to mention the fact that it can easily bring numbers to bear on either side for the run game, a team strength. It'd also be nice to see this formation with two running backs in the backfield. Perhaps I'm asking for too much, who knows?

In conclusion, the above plays provide a jumping off point from which to build the offensive repetoire. As has been shown, there are many opportunities to simplify and utilize modern concepts that lend themselves to team strengths. Much of the above can be adapted to suit Swoopes and I suspect it was made so with that idea in mind. There was simply no way this staff could count on Ash given the bad run of luck he's had regarding his health. So, there it is. Let's smash some Cougars!!!









Tuesday, September 2, 2014

The Texas Opener

I thought I'd provide some thoughts regarding the Texas season opener vs UNT. With so much mystery surrounding this team under new head coach Charlie Strong, many didn't know what they might see on Saturday night at DKR. Well, I'm here to tell you that I came away with a positive outlook based on what transpired. The following are some things that stood out to me.

The defense! Whoa! There was pressure provided by every level Saturday night! Texas fans saw a dominant defensive line, fast flowing and coverage savvy linebackers, and a pressure-oriented secondary. It's clear what the staff envisions for this defense this year and moving forward. Vance Bedford plans to attack Big 12 offenses with relentless pressure from all levels of the defense. "Basketball on grass" will now have to face the defensive football equivalent of the full court press, Texas Football's version of the '94 Arkansas Razorbacks basketball team. Except we'll rename it "60 minutes of hell." Bedford's defense will apply pressure using zone concepts and man-coverage techniques. A perfect example was Texas' first INT. Shiro Davis dropped from his typical spot on the defensive line (stand up) to cover the slot receiver, walled him off, then trailed him to force a very difficult throw from the quarterback. We know what happened next. Also, was that 2-man zone coverage? I won't go further, but it was refreshing to see proper leverage, proper pursuit angles, and high effort, all of which tend to aid in sure tackling (hat tip to Mykkele). 

Let's turn to the offense. While we didn't see Ash and the gang short circuit the scoreboard, we did see competent blocking by all (most of the time) and a physical disposition that will be necessary going forward. I felt our offensive collective (OC) called a game akin to an NFL preseason  game. The team worked on base concepts and approached the game as an opportunity to practice against "live fire". It will be interesting to see this offense evolve, for as you know, Texas will likely move forward without David Ash. Nevertheless, I thought the signal-caller played average in his debut as he was inconsistent throughout, held the ball too long on occasion, and probably missed some downfield reads. From an overall scheme perspective, I really liked what I saw on Saturday. It turns out, Watson and Wickline may have put their heads together after all. Texas fans saw glimpses of what can best be described as a convergence of Watson's UL offense and Wickline's OSU offense. I'll explain more in my next post, but what I saw was an offense built around the zone run scheme, complete with a ball control oriented quick passing game, packaged run-pass plays, a running back screen game, and a limited view of the vertical passing game. With Tyrone Swoopes likely serving that role from here on out, I expect the offense to slightly change in order to suit his strengths. 

I hate to exclude special teams, but there wasn't much there but a missed field goal and the positive of no penalties. So, until next time, hook'em!

Thursday, August 7, 2014

Texas Offense: Personnel and Formations...

What I'd like to present here are some of the Spring Game formations Texas' starting offense presented to Texas' base defense, the 4-3 under (3-technique DT to the boundary or away from passing strength). For more information regarding the 4-3 under defense, a simple google search of exactly that should suffice. So, what we can gather from these clips are the basics of what Shawn Watson and Joe Wickline may scheme vs an opponent who plays the 4-3 under defense. The general formations and plays will not change vs other defenses, but for those keeping better track of details, they may find that tidbit important. So, let's get to the personnel and formations. I won't get into much detail as those who know football better than me will not need it and it's also easier to keep things simple. Let's take a look at the Texas Spring Game personnel and formation overview.

What you'll see here is "12" personnel (1 RB, 2 TE) with the WR on the left "removed" from the formation in favor of 2 WR's to the right. The QB is under center with the RB deep behind him. This formation is also accompanied by some motion from the wing player. Notice the safety move with the wing player in motion, often indicating man coverage.

http://www.tubechop.com/watch/3416217

Next is "11" personnel (1 RB, 1 TE) with an in-line TE making a 3X1 formation, 3 receiving threats to the right, the field and 1 receiving threat to the left, the boundary.

http://www.tubechop.com/watch/3416283

This is "20" personnel (2 RB, 0 TE) and is referred to as a split-back formation.  We see the same WR alignments as the previous play. The RB's in this formation can stay in for pass protection or they may release into the receiving pattern.

http://www.tubechop.com/watch/3416310

The following is "11" personnel again, except all 3 WR's are split to the boundary. The QB is now in what is commonly referred to as the "pistol" formation, shotgun with a RB lined up a short distance behind him. Notice the RB shift positions to the right and slightly behind the QB. This will alter the type of run called and possible pass protection. The RB may also stay of course and you'll note the possible WR screen threat to the boundary.

http://www.tubechop.com/watch/3416337

Here is "22" personnel (2 RB, 2 TE) and the "I" formation, FB and RB in the backfield with QB under center. Both TE's are in-line. Notice the WR in "jet" motion from the left, he slows up and proceeds to block the edge defender with inside-out leverage, a kick-out block.

http://www.tubechop.com/watch/3416365

This provides a glimpse of how Watson will move players pre-snap to gain leverage and numbers. I would also anticipate seeing other plays in this series where the motion WR bypasses the block and releases into the pattern.

The following personnel is "10" personnel (1 RB, 0 TE) and the formation is a 3X1 WR spread formation. This personnel will be seen in a 2X2 WR spread formation and in formations with the WR's in "reduced" splits, alignment near the ends of the OL.

http://www.tubechop.com/watch/3418387

In the above clip, you can see the QB fail to properly set protection. The Mike (middle LB) easily drops down and to the left edge of the OL and has a clear path to the QB. The QB must realize there are 3 "blitzers" to each side of the OL and properly set the protection or recognize the free runner at the snap and immediately get the ball out to his "hot" read.

I'll go ahead and stop here. There are other personnel and formations, like "23" personnel (2 RB, 3 TE) in "heavy" formations Texas fans may see in short yardage or goal line situations. Also, there is a plethora of other alignments within the same personnel groupings Watson will use to game plan vs certain opponents. What I wanted to get accomplished here was to highlight the basics. I also wanted to hint at a few of the "surface games" played at the line of scrimmage (LOS). Watson and Wickline's "multiple" offense will seek to challenge defenses' gap integrity and physicality on the interior and perimeter of the line of scrimmage. All the while, using those same "surface games" as a jump-off to run various run-action quick passing plays as well as play-action to the intermediate and deep zones in coverage. I hope you enjoyed.


Tuesday, August 5, 2014

Shawn Watson's Offense

It's about that time! College football is just around the corner, so I thought I'd write about Texas' new offense under Shawn Watson and Joe Wickline. After viewing Texas' Spring Game, I think it's fair to say Longhorns fans can expect an offense very similar to what Watson ran at Louisville. So, what did Watson do at Louisville?

For starters, I can't begin to properly characterize Watson's Louisville offense. I don't think it's as easy as referring to it as a West Coast Offense (WCO), in it's pure form anyway. However, what I do see is a framework based on the modern NFL offense, an "NFL-Lite" offense if you will. That may be a good place to begin.

The reasons I characterize Watson's offensive framework as "NFL-Lite" are due to what I see on Sundays. NFL offenses utilize multiple personnel and formations in both traditional and spread sets. They often utilize shifts and motions to prognosticate defensive intent and gain small advantages in numbers, leverage, space, and confusion. NFL quarterbacks will line up under center and shotgun and will feature a greater variety of handoffs, drop backs, and play-action quarterback movement. The NFL passing game presents a mix of ball control, vertical concepts, and screens meant to attack all zones, short, intermediate, and deep. Lastly, NFL offenses have begun integrating modern read-option strategies and tactics, a welcome change for die-hard college football fans. All of the above are utilized by Watson, presumably in a much more compact and streamlined manner suitable for college football players limited by practice-time rules.

So, in short, it looks complicated. It's difficult to cover the breadth of Watson's offense in one post. So, instead it may be better to start watching plays and begin to see how personnel, formation, and play calls are tied together. It's my view that Watson runs the same concepts from multiple formations with a tiered organization based on down, distance, and situation. So, play series from formations meant more for early downs and ball control will differ from play series meant for vertical passing and late downs. However, that doesn't mean he won't flip personnel and formation on those same downs and within those same play series. Watson's intent is to completely control the initiative and make it so the defense must play honest at all times or get caught playing to a false tendency. That's my take anyway. This is no spread offense that dictates with tempo and spacing, though I wouldn't exclude those strategies. Watson's offense will dictate with a "surface game" of personnel, formations, shifts, and motion all meant to disguise a finite amount of offensive concepts that all coalesce to form the offensive framwork. Get it!? Let's start with some examples. 

http://www.tubechop.com/watch/3412676

Above we have "11" personnel, split-zone to the right. I chose this play because I anticipate this to be a staple for Texas in 2014 and it will serve as a basis for what is potentially our best personnel. On to the next one.

http://www.tubechop.com/watch/3412693

Watson makes a similar call 3 plays later with the same personnel on 1st down. The scheme up front is changed to "wide zone" with the same "split" action from the wing player, but here he releases to the flat and the quarterback keeps the ball on the bootleg. Notice how much more space this creates for what is most likely a high-low read with a run or throw away option. Also, notice that the defensive end is completely fooled, ankles "broken". Again, a very basic example, but you can easily see how these two plays relate. The beauty? What if the other team can't stop the zone run? You can run these plays all game, that's what!

Let's turn to another personnel grouping and formation, "22" personnel and the "I" formation. I actually like the "I". I only question Texas' current roster's ability to fill the FB role. Again, another formation with a similar concept, zone. Let's take a look.

http://www.tubechop.com/watch/3412717

In the next sequence, you'll note Watson run G-Lead, then afterward a play-action pass play off of the same lead run-action. Again, an illustration of how Watson will fit complimentary schemes together and run series from the same look and action. He will do this with regard to the pass game as well and work in draw and screen plays to prey on defensive overcommitment.

http://www.tubechop.com/watch/3412723

Notice where the lead ends up on the 2nd play, besides hurt of course. Also, look at the defensive flow towards the run-action! The Mike is busted, but the Sam is there to save the day (at least I think that's Sam). Once again, you begin to see how a play series is set up in Watson's offense and how the same concepts can be run with different personnel and formations. This is the tip of the iceberg, but what I've gleaned thus far from Watson is that he runs complimentary concepts with various personnel and formations in order to keep defenses "flat-footed" and guessing wrong. It may not soothe many Longhorns fans' yearning for explosive plays and repeat appearances on ESPN highlight reels, but hey! We have our own network for that. I may continue my exploration of Watson's offense and since this is my first blog post ever, please feel free to give me constructive feedback.